ETF Analysis

Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF - A Superior Smart Beta Dividend Fund

Published May 15, 2023

SCHD remains one of the cleaner examples of a transparent long-only ETF that captures a multi-factor dividend-quality profile without relying on opaque active judgment.

Factor Tombstone

Metric SCHD
Fund Score 100
Value Factor Score 40
Small Factor Score 0
Profitability Factor Score 95
Investment Factor Score 83
Relative Dividend Valuation 76.7

What the Factor Profile Shows

SCHD looks less like a pure high-yield screen and more like a well-implemented quality-value dividend strategy. In the factor decompositions below, the persistent contributions come primarily from profitability and investment, with value making a smaller but still meaningful contribution. That is exactly the sort of profile a rules-based dividend ETF should hope to achieve.

Regression Summary Table

The table below summarizes SCHD across CAPM, FF6, AQR, and q5 specifications.

Parameter CAPM FF6 AQR q5
Alpha (annualized %) 3.08% 0.91% 0.22% 0.43%
Fit (Adj. R^2) 0.83 0.91 0.92 0.90
Market beta 0.84 0.87 0.93 0.93
HML / value coefficient - 0.14 0.31 -
QMJ / quality coefficient - - 0.29 -
RMW coefficient - 0.27 - -
CMA coefficient - 0.26 - -
Fund Sharpe (analysis period) 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Relative Sharpe (analysis period) 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19
Relative Sharpe (historical implied) 1.60 1.80 1.71 1.63
Factor beta ex market (historical implied) 0.0% 2.8% 2.8% 2.2%
Analysis period 11.17Y / 134M 11.17Y / 134M 11.17Y / 134M 11.17Y / 134M
Start date 2011-Nov 2011-Nov 2011-Nov 2011-Nov

Factor Contribution Charts

The charts below show SCHD's factor decomposition across the study periods noted in each figure.

SCHD Synthetic Factor Decomposition
Coefficients through Apr 2020 applied to the full factor-history backtest
SCHD Synthetic Factor DecompositionSynthetic factor decomposition for SCHD using coefficients through Apr 2020. Values correspond to the study window shown in this article.0%5%10%Annualized Contribution %Mkt: 9.7%. Positive factor contribution.9.7%SMB5: -0.3%. Negative factor contribution.-0.3%HML: 0.1%. Positive factor contribution.0.1%RMW: 1.2%. Positive factor contribution.1.2%CMA: 1.2%. Positive factor contribution.1.2%UMD: 0.5%. Positive factor contribution.0.5%Alpha: -0.9%. Negative factor contribution.-0.9%Total: 11.4%. Total annualized contribution.11.4%MktSMB5HMLRMWCMAUMDAlphaTotal
Synthetic factor decomposition for SCHD using coefficients through Apr 2020.
Values correspond to the study window shown in this article.
SCHD Synthetic Factor Decomposition
Coefficients through Dec 2022 applied to the full factor-history backtest
SCHD Synthetic Factor DecompositionSynthetic factor decomposition for SCHD using coefficients through Dec 2022. Values correspond to the study window shown in this article.0%5%10%Annualized Contribution %Mkt: 12.1%. Positive factor contribution.12.1%SMB5: 0.3%. Positive factor contribution.0.3%HML: -0.1%. Negative factor contribution.-0.1%RMW: 0.1%. Positive factor contribution.0.1%CMA: -0.3%. Negative factor contribution.-0.3%UMD: 0.2%. Positive factor contribution.0.2%Alpha: -0.8%. Negative factor contribution.-0.8%Total: 11.6%. Total annualized contribution.11.6%MktSMB5HMLRMWCMAUMDAlphaTotal
Synthetic factor decomposition for SCHD using coefficients through Dec 2022.
Values correspond to the study window shown in this article.
SCHD Actual Factor Decomposition
May 2020 through Dec 2022 live period
SCHD Actual Factor DecompositionActual factor decomposition for SCHD over the live period shown here. Values correspond to the study window shown in this article.0%5%10%Annualized Contribution %Mkt: 9.1%. Positive factor contribution.9.1%SMB5: 0.2%. Positive factor contribution.0.2%HML: 1.0%. Positive factor contribution.1.0%RMW: 0.8%. Positive factor contribution.0.8%CMA: 0.7%. Positive factor contribution.0.7%UMD: -0.6%. Negative factor contribution.-0.6%Alpha: -0.1%. Negative factor contribution.-0.1%Total: 11.0%. Total annualized contribution.11.0%MktSMB5HMLRMWCMAUMDAlphaTotal
Actual factor decomposition for SCHD over the live period shown here.
Values correspond to the study window shown in this article.

Conclusion

SCHD continues to work as a case study because the fund's construction logic is intelligible and the factor mapping is coherent. The point is not that any dividend ETF deserves a premium simply for paying income. The point is that SCHD historically looked like a relatively efficient long-only carrier of quality and value, with a dividend overlay that did not require heroic assumptions to justify itself.

Research disclaimer

These notes are educational research and methodology commentary, not personalized advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any fund. Use them to sharpen your ETF due diligence, not to skip it.

Keep Exploring

Use the research above as a starting point, then validate the fund in the live data tables: compare it against the current US ETF Leaders or Canadian ETF Leaders, and review the broader US or Canadian universe pages for full factor context.

Recent Research Notes
US ETF Leaders Canadian ETF Leaders US Universe CA Universe Methodology
Quick page feedback
Was this article useful?

Rate the research note, then tell us what to clarify or what you want covered next.

One click opens the detailed form with your rating preselected.
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.