Verified factor-similar cluster

ETFs Similar to OUSA

Each fund below shares verified factor exposure with OUSA and has no more than 3% annualized modeled factor tracking error over either the common 36-month window or the longer factor-history check. Tracking error measures volatility, not the direction of returns. The score runs from 80 at that limit to 100 for identical fitted exposures. See the matching method.

RMW CMA

Factor tags describe the source fund's verified public exposures. A matched ETF may have additional material factors.

Explore a shared-factor theme
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
CMA
Modeled factor tracking error 1.44%/yr · longer factor history 1.48%/yr · 36 months through 2026-08
Compare OUSA vs FDVV
90 Very close factor fit
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
CMA
Modeled factor tracking error 2.24%/yr · longer factor history 2.11%/yr · 36 months through 2026-08
Compare OUSA vs QDEF
85 Factor-similar
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
RMW
Modeled factor tracking error 2.55%/yr · longer factor history 2.62%/yr · 36 months through 2026-08
Compare OUSA vs DGRO
83 Factor-similar
POWA
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF
RMW CMA
Modeled factor tracking error 2.55%/yr · longer factor history 2.89%/yr · 36 months through 2026-08
Compare OUSA vs POWA
81 Factor-similar
OUSA fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe Similarity methodology
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.