ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
UMD
Adj. R2
0.799
Rel. Sharpe
0.347
Mkt beta
0.79
AUM
US$242M
MER
0.79%
Valuation
135
ETF comparison
Verified factor-similar pair
ADME vs FDMO
These two ETFs meet the same FF6 US comparison criteria: US-listed equity ETFs, the same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.
UMD
Similarity score
85
Verified similar
The score combines exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.
Quick Read
- FDMO has the higher backtested relative Sharpe (1.058 vs 0.347).
- FDMO has the lower published fee (0.15% vs 0.79%).
- ADME is cheaper on dividend valuation (135 vs 163, where 100 is each fund's historical median).
- FDMO has the stronger regression fit (adjusted R-squared 0.964 vs 0.799).
These are screening signals, not a complete review of portfolio construction, turnover, taxes, or trading quality.
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
UMD
Adj. R2
0.964
Rel. Sharpe
1.058
Mkt beta
1.04
AUM
US$785M
MER
0.15%
Valuation
163
Factor Exposure Match
Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.
SMB
diff +0.03
HML
diff -0.01
RMW
diff +0.15
CMA
diff -0.02
UMD
diff -0.00
Why This Pair Matches
Exposure level
90
Exposure shape
92
Mkt beta diff
0.25
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.711
This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure. It does not compare holdings methodology, turnover, tax handling, or issuer process. Backtested relative Sharpe is a secondary signal rather than a stand-alone forecast. See methodology.
Monthly updates
Get the next US ETF leaders update
Get one monthly email when the US leaders table refreshes, plus methodology and comparison-page updates.
Monthly leaders refresh
Download-access updates
Low-volume research notes
One monthly email when the data drop lands. This browser will remember you after signup.