Verified factor-similar pair

ADME vs PDP

These two ETFs meet the same FF6 US comparison criteria: US-listed equity ETFs, the same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

UMD
Similarity score
84
Verified similar

The score combines exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

Quick Read

  • PDP has the higher backtested relative Sharpe (0.815 vs 0.347).
  • PDP has the lower published fee (0.62% vs 0.79%).
  • ADME is cheaper on dividend valuation (135 vs 146, where 100 is each fund's historical median).
  • PDP has the stronger regression fit (adjusted R-squared 0.885 vs 0.799).

These are screening signals, not a complete review of portfolio construction, turnover, taxes, or trading quality.

ADME

Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
UMD
Adj. R2
0.799
Rel. Sharpe
0.347
Mkt beta
0.79
AUM
US$242M
MER
0.79%
Valuation
135

PDP

Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
UMD
Adj. R2
0.885
Rel. Sharpe
0.815
Mkt beta
1.08
AUM
US$1.4B
MER
0.62%
Valuation
146

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
ADME
+0.01
|t|
+0.1
PDP
+0.18
|t|
+3.4
diff -0.17
HML
ADME
-0.06
|t|
-1.0
PDP
-0.11
|t|
-2.3
diff +0.05
RMW
ADME
+0.06
|t|
+0.8
PDP
-0.03
|t|
-0.5
diff +0.09
CMA
ADME
-0.04
|t|
-0.4
PDP
-0.10
|t|
-1.3
diff +0.06
UMD
ADME
+0.24
|t|
+4.9
PDP
+0.23
|t|
+7.9
diff +0.01

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
89
Exposure shape
89
Mkt beta diff
0.29
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.468

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure. It does not compare holdings methodology, turnover, tax handling, or issuer process. Backtested relative Sharpe is a secondary signal rather than a stand-alone forecast. See methodology.

ADME fund page PDP fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.