Verified factor-similar pair

AESR vs FCPI

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

UMD
Similarity score
81
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

AESR

Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF
UMD
Adj. R2
0.969
Rel. Sharpe
0.965
Mkt beta
1.05
AUM
US$153M
MER
1.18%
Valuation
36

FCPI

Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF
UMD
Adj. R2
0.912
Rel. Sharpe
0.964
Mkt beta
0.96
AUM
US$267M
MER
0.15%
Valuation
104

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
AESR
-0.15
|t|
-3.3
FCPI
-0.01
|t|
-0.1
diff -0.14
HML
AESR
-0.00
|t|
-0.1
FCPI
+0.15
|t|
+2.6
diff -0.16
RMW
AESR
-0.04
|t|
-0.9
FCPI
+0.11
|t|
+1.4
diff -0.15
CMA
AESR
+0.12
|t|
+2.3
FCPI
+0.19
|t|
+2.3
diff -0.07
UMD
AESR
+0.14
|t|
+4.6
FCPI
+0.13
|t|
+2.6
diff +0.01

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
82
Exposure shape
76
Mkt beta diff
0.08
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.001

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

AESR fund page FCPI fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.