Verified factor-similar pair

BBSC vs IWM

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB
Similarity score
92
Near substitute

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

BBSC

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
SMB
Adj. R2
0.988
Rel. Sharpe
0.819
Mkt beta
1.07
AUM
US$700M
MER
0.09%
Valuation
128

IWM

iShares Russell 2000 ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.986
Rel. Sharpe
0.785
Mkt beta
1.02
AUM
US$73.2B
MER
0.19%
Valuation
136

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
BBSC
+0.93
|t|
+26.7
IWM
+0.82
|t|
+50.5
diff +0.12
HML
BBSC
+0.05
|t|
+1.7
IWM
+0.10
|t|
+6.2
diff -0.05
RMW
BBSC
-0.12
|t|
-3.3
IWM
-0.07
|t|
-4.0
diff -0.05
CMA
BBSC
+0.05
|t|
+1.1
IWM
-0.00
|t|
-0.1
diff +0.05
UMD
BBSC
+0.03
|t|
+1.2
IWM
+0.04
|t|
+3.9
diff -0.00

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
91
Exposure shape
100
Mkt beta diff
0.05
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.034

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

BBSC fund page IWM fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.