Verified factor-similar pair

DFUV vs IMCV

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

HML
Similarity score
88
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

DFUV

Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
HML
Adj. R2
0.948
Rel. Sharpe
1.146
Mkt beta
0.89
AUM
US$14.0B
MER
0.21%
Valuation
114

IMCV

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF
HML
Adj. R2
0.953
Rel. Sharpe
1.019
Mkt beta
0.97
AUM
US$1.0B
MER
0.06%
Valuation
114

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
DFUV
+0.18
|t|
+2.5
IMCV
+0.24
|t|
+7.7
diff -0.06
HML
DFUV
+0.46
|t|
+6.0
IMCV
+0.35
|t|
+11.7
diff +0.11
RMW
DFUV
+0.09
|t|
+1.1
IMCV
+0.14
|t|
+3.6
diff -0.06
CMA
DFUV
+0.15
|t|
+1.7
IMCV
+0.17
|t|
+3.7
diff -0.01
UMD
DFUV
-0.05
|t|
-1.1
IMCV
-0.10
|t|
-5.8
diff +0.05

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
87
Exposure shape
98
Mkt beta diff
0.08
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.127

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

DFUV fund page IMCV fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.