Verified factor-similar pair

ESML vs VB

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB
Similarity score
93
Near substitute

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

ESML

iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.981
Rel. Sharpe
0.806
Mkt beta
1.00
AUM
US$2.3B
MER
0.17%
Valuation
122

VB

Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.977
Rel. Sharpe
0.935
Mkt beta
1.03
AUM
US$73.1B
MER
0.03%
Valuation
113

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
ESML
+0.73
|t|
+18.9
VB
+0.64
|t|
+27.7
diff +0.08
HML
ESML
+0.13
|t|
+4.0
VB
+0.09
|t|
+4.1
diff +0.04
RMW
ESML
-0.01
|t|
-0.2
VB
-0.01
|t|
-0.2
diff -0.00
CMA
ESML
+0.00
|t|
+0.0
VB
-0.02
|t|
-0.7
diff +0.02
UMD
ESML
+0.03
|t|
+1.2
VB
+0.00
|t|
+0.1
diff +0.03

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
93
Exposure shape
100
Mkt beta diff
0.03
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.129

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

ESML fund page VB fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.