FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.916
Rel. Sharpe
1.190
Mkt beta
1.05
AUM
US$1.2B
MER
0.43%
Valuation
133
ETF comparison
Verified factor-similar pair
FFSM vs QVMS
These two ETFs meet the same FF6 US comparison criteria: US-listed equity ETFs, the same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.
SMB
Similarity score
88
Verified similar
The score combines exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.
Quick Read
- QVMS has the higher backtested relative Sharpe (1.218 vs 1.190).
- QVMS has the lower published fee (0.15% vs 0.43%).
- QVMS is cheaper on dividend valuation (131 vs 133, where 100 is each fund's historical median).
- QVMS has the stronger regression fit (adjusted R-squared 0.974 vs 0.916).
These are screening signals, not a complete review of portfolio construction, turnover, taxes, or trading quality.
QVMS
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.974
Rel. Sharpe
1.218
Mkt beta
0.98
AUM
US$217M
MER
0.15%
Valuation
131
Factor Exposure Match
Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.
SMB
diff -0.36
HML
diff -0.03
RMW
diff -0.07
CMA
diff +0.01
UMD
diff +0.02
Why This Pair Matches
Exposure level
85
Exposure shape
100
Mkt beta diff
0.07
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.029
This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure. It does not compare holdings methodology, turnover, tax handling, or issuer process. Backtested relative Sharpe is a secondary signal rather than a stand-alone forecast. See methodology.
Monthly updates
Get the next US ETF leaders update
Get one monthly email when the US leaders table refreshes, plus methodology and comparison-page updates.
Monthly leaders refresh
Download-access updates
Low-volume research notes
One monthly email when the data drop lands. This browser will remember you after signup.