Verified factor-similar pair

FNDA vs MDYG

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB
Similarity score
81
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

FNDA

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.978
Rel. Sharpe
1.011
Mkt beta
1.02
AUM
US$9.8B
MER
0.25%
Valuation
148

MDYG

State Street SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.911
Rel. Sharpe
0.850
Mkt beta
1.03
AUM
US$2.6B
MER
0.15%
Valuation
156

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
FNDA
+0.73
|t|
+24.3
MDYG
+0.47
|t|
+10.3
diff +0.27
HML
FNDA
+0.26
|t|
+9.2
MDYG
-0.07
|t|
-1.7
diff +0.33
RMW
FNDA
+0.17
|t|
+4.6
MDYG
+0.14
|t|
+2.5
diff +0.03
CMA
FNDA
+0.03
|t|
+0.7
MDYG
-0.00
|t|
-0.1
diff +0.03
UMD
FNDA
-0.00
|t|
-0.2
MDYG
+0.02
|t|
+0.9
diff -0.03

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
77
Exposure shape
94
Mkt beta diff
0.01
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.161

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

FNDA fund page MDYG fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.