Verified factor-similar pair

IJR vs IJT

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB
Similarity score
87
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

IJR

iShares Core S&P Small Cap ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.970
Rel. Sharpe
0.952
Mkt beta
0.99
AUM
US$96.8B
MER
0.06%
Valuation
103

IJT

iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.948
Rel. Sharpe
0.970
Mkt beta
1.02
AUM
US$6.9B
MER
0.18%
Valuation
99

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
IJR
+0.83
|t|
+36.2
IJT
+0.80
|t|
+26.4
diff +0.03
HML
IJR
+0.20
|t|
+8.3
IJT
+0.05
|t|
+1.8
diff +0.14
RMW
IJR
+0.14
|t|
+5.2
IJT
+0.09
|t|
+2.5
diff +0.05
CMA
IJR
-0.02
|t|
-0.7
IJT
-0.08
|t|
-1.7
diff +0.05
UMD
IJR
+0.03
|t|
+2.1
IJT
+0.10
|t|
+6.2
diff -0.08

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
83
Exposure shape
99
Mkt beta diff
0.02
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.018

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

IJR fund page IJT fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.