Verified factor-similar pair

IMCV vs JAVA

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

HML
Similarity score
87
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

IMCV

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF
HML
Adj. R2
0.953
Rel. Sharpe
1.019
Mkt beta
0.97
AUM
US$1.0B
MER
0.06%
Valuation
114

JAVA

JPMorgan Active Value ETF
HML
Adj. R2
0.921
Rel. Sharpe
1.008
Mkt beta
0.84
AUM
US$6.2B
MER
0.44%
Valuation
110

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
IMCV
+0.24
|t|
+7.7
JAVA
+0.09
|t|
+1.3
diff +0.15
HML
IMCV
+0.35
|t|
+11.7
JAVA
+0.36
|t|
+5.2
diff -0.01
RMW
IMCV
+0.14
|t|
+3.6
JAVA
+0.01
|t|
+0.1
diff +0.13
CMA
IMCV
+0.17
|t|
+3.7
JAVA
+0.17
|t|
+1.9
diff -0.00
UMD
IMCV
-0.10
|t|
-5.8
JAVA
-0.05
|t|
-1.0
diff -0.06

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
86
Exposure shape
96
Mkt beta diff
0.13
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.011

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

IMCV fund page JAVA fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.