Verified factor-similar pair

IUSV vs IWX

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

HML
Similarity score
94
Near substitute

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

IUSV

iShares Core S&P US Value ETF
HML
Adj. R2
0.963
Rel. Sharpe
1.050
Mkt beta
0.94
AUM
US$24.7B
MER
0.04%
Valuation
122

IWX

iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
HML
Adj. R2
0.934
Rel. Sharpe
1.030
Mkt beta
0.88
AUM
US$3.6B
MER
0.20%
Valuation
144

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
IUSV
+0.01
|t|
+0.6
IWX
-0.09
|t|
-2.7
diff +0.10
HML
IUSV
+0.29
|t|
+14.0
IWX
+0.29
|t|
+8.9
diff +0.00
RMW
IUSV
+0.08
|t|
+3.3
IWX
+0.03
|t|
+0.8
diff +0.04
CMA
IUSV
+0.16
|t|
+5.4
IWX
+0.15
|t|
+3.2
diff +0.01
UMD
IUSV
-0.03
|t|
-2.5
IWX
-0.03
|t|
-1.2
diff -0.00

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
95
Exposure shape
97
Mkt beta diff
0.06
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.020

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

IUSV fund page IWX fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.