Verified factor-similar pair

IWN vs VBR

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB HML
Similarity score
89
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

IWN

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
SMB HML
Adj. R2
0.978
Rel. Sharpe
0.982
Mkt beta
0.96
AUM
US$12.9B
MER
0.24%
Valuation
123

VBR

Vanguard Small Cap Value ETF
SMB HML
Adj. R2
0.975
Rel. Sharpe
1.029
Mkt beta
1.01
AUM
US$33.7B
MER
0.05%
Valuation
106

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
IWN
+0.83
|t|
+41.2
VBR
+0.60
|t|
+24.6
diff +0.23
HML
IWN
+0.38
|t|
+18.2
VBR
+0.32
|t|
+13.6
diff +0.05
RMW
IWN
+0.10
|t|
+4.2
VBR
+0.12
|t|
+4.0
diff -0.03
CMA
IWN
+0.07
|t|
+2.3
VBR
+0.03
|t|
+0.8
diff +0.04
UMD
IWN
+0.02
|t|
+1.7
VBR
-0.03
|t|
-2.3
diff +0.05

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
87
Exposure shape
100
Mkt beta diff
0.04
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.047

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

IWN fund page VBR fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.