Verified factor-similar pair

JMOM vs PWB

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

UMD
Similarity score
85
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

JMOM

JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
UMD
Adj. R2
0.965
Rel. Sharpe
1.102
Mkt beta
1.03
AUM
US$2.1B
MER
0.12%
Valuation
119

PWB

Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF
UMD
Adj. R2
0.938
Rel. Sharpe
0.991
Mkt beta
1.08
AUM
US$1.7B
MER
0.55%
Valuation
646

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
JMOM
+0.05
|t|
+1.3
PWB
-0.08
|t|
-2.2
diff +0.13
HML
JMOM
-0.06
|t|
-1.6
PWB
-0.19
|t|
-5.9
diff +0.14
RMW
JMOM
+0.02
|t|
+0.4
PWB
-0.05
|t|
-1.2
diff +0.07
CMA
JMOM
-0.06
|t|
-1.1
PWB
-0.03
|t|
-0.7
diff -0.02
UMD
JMOM
+0.20
|t|
+7.4
PWB
+0.17
|t|
+8.7
diff +0.04

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
87
Exposure shape
84
Mkt beta diff
0.06
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.110

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

JMOM fund page PWB fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.