Verified factor-similar pair

NUMV vs VONV

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

HML
Similarity score
84
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

NUMV

Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
HML
Adj. R2
0.930
Rel. Sharpe
0.557
Mkt beta
0.98
AUM
US$422M
MER
0.31%
Valuation
180

VONV

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
HML
Adj. R2
0.957
Rel. Sharpe
1.043
Mkt beta
0.92
AUM
US$17.4B
MER
0.06%
Valuation
129

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
NUMV
+0.23
|t|
+3.8
VONV
+0.03
|t|
+1.2
diff +0.19
HML
NUMV
+0.39
|t|
+7.6
VONV
+0.29
|t|
+10.5
diff +0.10
RMW
NUMV
+0.10
|t|
+1.4
VONV
+0.07
|t|
+1.9
diff +0.03
CMA
NUMV
+0.03
|t|
+0.4
VONV
+0.12
|t|
+3.1
diff -0.09
UMD
NUMV
-0.05
|t|
-1.3
VONV
-0.01
|t|
-0.7
diff -0.04

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
84
Exposure shape
94
Mkt beta diff
0.05
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.485

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

NUMV fund page VONV fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.