Verified factor-similar pair

OMFS vs QVMM

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB
Similarity score
83
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

OMFS

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.941
Rel. Sharpe
0.914
Mkt beta
0.93
AUM
US$269M
MER
0.39%
Valuation
161

QVMM

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.943
Rel. Sharpe
0.943
Mkt beta
1.01
AUM
US$392M
MER
0.15%
Valuation
117

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
OMFS
+0.85
|t|
+12.8
QVMM
+0.58
|t|
+8.0
diff +0.28
HML
OMFS
+0.17
|t|
+3.1
QVMM
+0.17
|t|
+2.4
diff +0.00
RMW
OMFS
+0.02
|t|
+0.3
QVMM
+0.24
|t|
+3.3
diff -0.21
CMA
OMFS
+0.15
|t|
+1.8
QVMM
+0.07
|t|
+0.8
diff +0.08
UMD
OMFS
-0.02
|t|
-0.4
QVMM
+0.02
|t|
+0.5
diff -0.04

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
79
Exposure shape
97
Mkt beta diff
0.08
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.029

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

OMFS fund page QVMM fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.