Verified factor-similar pair

PHO vs UPGD

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB
Similarity score
80
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

PHO

Invesco Water Resources ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.804
Rel. Sharpe
0.613
Mkt beta
1.01
AUM
US$2.1B
MER
0.59%
Valuation
90

UPGD

Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.882
Rel. Sharpe
0.602
Mkt beta
1.07
AUM
US$110M
MER
0.40%
Valuation
59

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
PHO
+0.42
|t|
+6.1
UPGD
+0.66
|t|
+10.7
diff -0.24
HML
PHO
-0.13
|t|
-1.9
UPGD
+0.08
|t|
+1.3
diff -0.20
RMW
PHO
+0.17
|t|
+1.9
UPGD
+0.08
|t|
+1.0
diff +0.09
CMA
PHO
+0.15
|t|
+1.5
UPGD
+0.00
|t|
+0.0
diff +0.15
UMD
PHO
-0.00
|t|
-0.1
UPGD
-0.05
|t|
-1.3
diff +0.04

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
76
Exposure shape
93
Mkt beta diff
0.06
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.011

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

PHO fund page UPGD fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.