Verified factor-similar pair

PSC vs VB

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB
Similarity score
88
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

PSC

Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.955
Rel. Sharpe
0.902
Mkt beta
1.01
AUM
US$1.9B
MER
0.38%
Valuation
210

VB

Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.977
Rel. Sharpe
0.935
Mkt beta
1.03
AUM
US$73.1B
MER
0.03%
Valuation
113

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
PSC
+0.76
|t|
+14.1
VB
+0.64
|t|
+27.7
diff +0.12
HML
PSC
+0.25
|t|
+5.5
VB
+0.09
|t|
+4.1
diff +0.16
RMW
PSC
+0.08
|t|
+1.3
VB
-0.01
|t|
-0.2
diff +0.09
CMA
PSC
-0.07
|t|
-1.1
VB
-0.02
|t|
-0.7
diff -0.05
UMD
PSC
+0.05
|t|
+1.2
VB
+0.00
|t|
+0.1
diff +0.04

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
84
Exposure shape
99
Mkt beta diff
0.02
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.032

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

PSC fund page VB fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.