ETF comparison
Verified factor-similar pair

PSCI vs SLYG

These US-listed equity ETFs share verified FF6 US factor exposure. The modeled volatility of their factor-return difference is at or below 3% annualized on both the same 36-month window and a longer factor-history check.

SMB
Current similarity score
80
Factor-similar

The score is 100 for identical fitted exposures and 80 at the 3% modeled tracking-error limit. It includes market and non-market factors; it does not indicate which fund earned or is expected to earn more. How to read this score.

Quick Read

  • PSCI has the higher backtested relative Sharpe (1.188 vs 0.621).
  • SLYG has the lower published fee (0.15% vs 0.29%).
  • PSCI is cheaper on dividend valuation (51 vs 120, where 100 is each fund's historical median).
  • SLYG has the stronger regression fit (adjusted R-squared 0.925 vs 0.908).

These are screening signals, not a complete review of portfolio construction, turnover, taxes, or trading quality.

PSCI

Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.908
Rel. Sharpe
1.188
Mkt beta
1.02
AUM
US$167M
MER
0.29%
Valuation
51

SLYG

State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.925
Rel. Sharpe
0.621
Mkt beta
0.89
AUM
US$4.2B
MER
0.15%
Valuation
120

Market beta uses the common 36-month window through 2026-08. Adjusted R² and relative Sharpe describe each fund's separately published full-history model.

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare factor beta magnitude from the same 36 months shown above. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength; dim bars indicate |t| below 1.96. Every factor enters the distance calculation regardless of its t-statistic.

SMB
PSCI
+1.20
|t|
+7.6
SLYG
+1.02
|t|
+8.9
diff +0.18
HML
PSCI
+0.07
|t|
+0.4
SLYG
+0.21
|t|
+1.5
diff -0.14
RMW
PSCI
+0.16
|t|
+1.2
SLYG
+0.03
|t|
+0.3
diff +0.13
CMA
PSCI
+0.28
|t|
+1.3
SLYG
+0.20
|t|
+1.3
diff +0.08
UMD
PSCI
+0.44
|t|
+4.3
SLYG
+0.30
|t|
+4.0
diff +0.14

What Happened Over the Same 36 Months

PSCI adjusted total-return CAGR
19.41%
SLYG adjusted total-return CAGR
14.41%

PSCI ahead by 4.99 percentage points/year over 2023-09 through 2026-08. This is the observed difference between annualized compounded returns from adjusted prices, not an expected return or a factor-model estimate.

Historical factor attribution

Signed contribution to PSCI minus SLYG, percentage points/year, using fitted 36-month exposures and average factor returns over those same months:

Market factor
+2.01
Other factors, combined
-1.51
Total factor-implied difference
+0.50

This arithmetic-average factor attribution excludes the regression intercept and fund-specific return. It therefore need not equal the observed CAGR difference and is not a forecast.

Why This Pair Matches

Modeled factor tracking error · 36m
2.99%/yr
Modeled tracking error · 120m factor history
2.94%/yr
Mkt beta diff
0.13
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.566

Fitted exposures and factor covariance estimate the volatility, not the average or direction, of the funds' modeled return difference. The common regression window is 2023-09 through 2026-08. A short-window estimate and a longer factor-history check must both be at or below 3.000%; this is a screening limit, not a forecast. Holdings, turnover, taxes and trading costs require a separate review. The Sharpe figures elsewhere on this page come from each fund's published full-history model and do not enter similarity ranking. See the full methodology.

PSCI fund page SLYG fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.