Verified factor-similar pair

RFV vs RZV

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB HML RMW UMD
Similarity score
81
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

RFV

Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF
SMB HML RMW UMD
Adj. R2
0.940
Rel. Sharpe
0.800
Mkt beta
1.13
AUM
US$297M
MER
0.35%
Valuation
76

RZV

Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF
SMB HML RMW UMD
Adj. R2
0.918
Rel. Sharpe
0.650
Mkt beta
1.14
AUM
US$242M
MER
0.35%
Valuation
82

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
RFV
+0.64
|t|
+12.9
RZV
+1.10
|t|
+15.6
diff -0.46
HML
RFV
+0.40
|t|
+8.5
RZV
+0.52
|t|
+7.6
diff -0.11
RMW
RFV
+0.26
|t|
+4.2
RZV
+0.25
|t|
+2.8
diff +0.01
CMA
RFV
+0.07
|t|
+1.0
RZV
+0.12
|t|
+1.2
diff -0.05
UMD
RFV
-0.26
|t|
-9.0
RZV
-0.37
|t|
-9.2
diff +0.11

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
75
Exposure shape
99
Mkt beta diff
0.01
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.150

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

RFV fund page RZV fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.