Verified factor-similar pair

SLYG vs UPGD

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB
Similarity score
84
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

SLYG

State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.931
Rel. Sharpe
0.591
Mkt beta
1.05
AUM
US$4.2B
MER
0.15%
Valuation
130

UPGD

Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.882
Rel. Sharpe
0.602
Mkt beta
1.07
AUM
US$110M
MER
0.40%
Valuation
59

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
SLYG
+0.74
|t|
+19.1
UPGD
+0.66
|t|
+10.7
diff +0.08
HML
SLYG
-0.05
|t|
-1.3
UPGD
+0.08
|t|
+1.3
diff -0.13
RMW
SLYG
-0.16
|t|
-3.5
UPGD
+0.08
|t|
+1.0
diff -0.24
CMA
SLYG
-0.06
|t|
-1.0
UPGD
+0.00
|t|
+0.0
diff -0.06
UMD
SLYG
-0.03
|t|
-1.2
UPGD
-0.05
|t|
-1.3
diff +0.02

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
80
Exposure shape
96
Mkt beta diff
0.02
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.011

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

SLYG fund page UPGD fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.