Verified factor-similar pair

SMDV vs SMLV

These two ETFs meet the same FF6 US comparison criteria: US-listed equity ETFs, the same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB HML RMW
Similarity score
88
Verified similar

The score combines exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

Quick Read

  • SMLV has the higher backtested relative Sharpe (1.374 vs 1.252).
  • SMLV has the lower published fee (0.12% vs 0.40%).
  • SMDV is cheaper on dividend valuation (97 vs 130, where 100 is each fund's historical median).
  • SMLV has the stronger regression fit (adjusted R-squared 0.910 vs 0.810).

These are screening signals, not a complete review of portfolio construction, turnover, taxes, or trading quality.

SMDV

ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
SMB HML RMW
Adj. R2
0.810
Rel. Sharpe
1.252
Mkt beta
0.67
AUM
US$659M
MER
0.40%
Valuation
97

SMLV

State Street SPDR US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
SMB HML RMW
Adj. R2
0.910
Rel. Sharpe
1.374
Mkt beta
0.81
AUM
US$216M
MER
0.12%
Valuation
130

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
SMDV
+0.67
|t|
+9.0
SMLV
+0.79
|t|
+15.0
diff -0.12
HML
SMDV
+0.32
|t|
+4.6
SMLV
+0.36
|t|
+7.3
diff -0.05
RMW
SMDV
+0.27
|t|
+3.2
SMLV
+0.24
|t|
+3.9
diff +0.03
CMA
SMDV
+0.04
|t|
+0.4
SMLV
-0.05
|t|
-0.6
diff +0.09
UMD
SMDV
+0.08
|t|
+1.6
SMLV
+0.07
|t|
+2.0
diff +0.01

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
88
Exposure shape
100
Mkt beta diff
0.14
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.122

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure. It does not compare holdings methodology, turnover, tax handling, or issuer process. Backtested relative Sharpe is a secondary signal rather than a stand-alone forecast. See methodology.

SMDV fund page SMLV fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.