Verified factor-similar pair

VB vs VTWO

These two ETFs meet the same FF6 US comparison criteria: US-listed equity ETFs, the same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB
Similarity score
88
Verified similar

The score combines exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

Quick Read

  • VB has the higher backtested relative Sharpe (0.936 vs 0.866).
  • VB has the lower published fee (0.03% vs 0.06%).
  • VTWO has the stronger regression fit (adjusted R-squared 0.991 vs 0.976).

These are screening signals, not a complete review of portfolio construction, turnover, taxes, or trading quality.

VB

Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.976
Rel. Sharpe
0.936
Mkt beta
1.03
AUM
US$73.1B
MER
0.03%
Valuation
116

VTWO

Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.991
Rel. Sharpe
0.866
Mkt beta
1.02
AUM
US$14.8B
MER
0.06%
Valuation
116

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
VB
+0.65
|t|
+28.2
VTWO
+0.85
|t|
+47.9
diff -0.20
HML
VB
+0.09
|t|
+3.8
VTWO
+0.12
|t|
+6.8
diff -0.03
RMW
VB
-0.00
|t|
-0.1
VTWO
-0.10
|t|
-4.8
diff +0.09
CMA
VB
-0.01
|t|
-0.3
VTWO
-0.06
|t|
-2.2
diff +0.05
UMD
VB
-0.00
|t|
-0.4
VTWO
+0.07
|t|
+5.2
diff -0.07

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
84
Exposure shape
99
Mkt beta diff
0.01
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.070

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure. It does not compare holdings methodology, turnover, tax handling, or issuer process. Backtested relative Sharpe is a secondary signal rather than a stand-alone forecast. See methodology.

VB fund page VTWO fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.