Verified factor-similar pair

VLU vs VONV

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

HML
Similarity score
90
Near substitute

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

VLU

State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
HML
Adj. R2
0.909
Rel. Sharpe
1.170
Mkt beta
0.95
AUM
US$655M
MER
0.12%
Valuation
130

VONV

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
HML
Adj. R2
0.957
Rel. Sharpe
1.043
Mkt beta
0.92
AUM
US$17.4B
MER
0.06%
Valuation
129

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
VLU
+0.08
|t|
+1.7
VONV
+0.03
|t|
+1.2
diff +0.05
HML
VLU
+0.29
|t|
+6.4
VONV
+0.29
|t|
+10.5
diff -0.00
RMW
VLU
+0.03
|t|
+0.4
VONV
+0.07
|t|
+1.9
diff -0.04
CMA
VLU
+0.08
|t|
+1.3
VONV
+0.12
|t|
+3.1
diff -0.04
UMD
VLU
-0.07
|t|
-2.1
VONV
-0.01
|t|
-0.7
diff -0.06

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
89
Exposure shape
98
Mkt beta diff
0.03
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.127

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

VLU fund page VONV fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.