Verified factor-similar pair

VTWG vs VTWO

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB
Similarity score
82
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

VTWG

Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.983
Rel. Sharpe
0.663
Mkt beta
1.07
AUM
US$1.3B
MER
0.06%
Valuation
117

VTWO

Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
SMB
Adj. R2
0.991
Rel. Sharpe
0.857
Mkt beta
1.02
AUM
US$14.8B
MER
0.06%
Valuation
115

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
VTWG
+0.88
|t|
+34.5
VTWO
+0.86
|t|
+47.3
diff +0.03
HML
VTWG
-0.14
|t|
-5.6
VTWO
+0.11
|t|
+6.5
diff -0.25
RMW
VTWG
-0.21
|t|
-6.7
VTWO
-0.08
|t|
-3.8
diff -0.12
CMA
VTWG
-0.11
|t|
-3.0
VTWO
-0.05
|t|
-2.1
diff -0.05
UMD
VTWG
+0.12
|t|
+6.4
VTWO
+0.06
|t|
+4.9
diff +0.05

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
79
Exposure shape
97
Mkt beta diff
0.05
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.194

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

VTWG fund page VTWO fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.