Verified factor-similar pair

VTWV vs XMVM

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB HML
Similarity score
83
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

VTWV

Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
SMB HML
Adj. R2
0.980
Rel. Sharpe
0.947
Mkt beta
0.98
AUM
US$1.1B
MER
0.06%
Valuation
111

XMVM

Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
SMB HML
Adj. R2
0.899
Rel. Sharpe
1.001
Mkt beta
0.98
AUM
US$435M
MER
0.41%
Valuation
89

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
VTWV
+0.84
|t|
+31.0
XMVM
+0.44
|t|
+8.8
diff +0.40
HML
VTWV
+0.37
|t|
+14.3
XMVM
+0.34
|t|
+7.0
diff +0.03
RMW
VTWV
+0.03
|t|
+1.1
XMVM
+0.24
|t|
+3.7
diff -0.20
CMA
VTWV
+0.00
|t|
+0.1
XMVM
+0.03
|t|
+0.4
diff -0.02
UMD
VTWV
-0.00
|t|
-0.0
XMVM
-0.06
|t|
-2.1
diff +0.06

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
78
Exposure shape
95
Mkt beta diff
0.00
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.054

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

VTWV fund page XMVM fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.