Verified factor-similar pair

DGRS vs MVV

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB RMW
Similarity score
80
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

DGRS

WisdomTree US Smallcap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
SMB RMW
Adj. R2
0.958
Rel. Sharpe
1.004
Mkt beta
0.93
AUM
US$370M
MER
0.38%
Valuation
98

MVV

ProShares Ultra MidCap400
SMB RMW
Adj. R2
0.950
Rel. Sharpe
0.501
Mkt beta
2.01
AUM
US$146M
MER
1.01%
Valuation
74

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
DGRS
+0.85
|t|
+20.3
MVV
+1.00
|t|
+14.4
diff -0.14
HML
DGRS
+0.27
|t|
+7.0
MVV
+0.24
|t|
+3.7
diff +0.02
RMW
DGRS
+0.34
|t|
+6.7
MVV
+0.34
|t|
+4.0
diff +0.00
CMA
DGRS
+0.09
|t|
+1.5
MVV
-0.03
|t|
-0.3
diff +0.12
UMD
DGRS
-0.04
|t|
-1.3
MVV
+0.02
|t|
+0.5
diff -0.06

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
83
Exposure shape
99
Mkt beta diff
1.08
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.503

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

DGRS fund page MVV fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.