Verified factor-similar pair

MVV vs QVMS

These two ETFs pass the same FF6 US similarity lane: US-listed equity ETFs, same USD model basis, at least one material non-market factor, and 100% overlap in statistically significant material factor exposure.

SMB RMW
Similarity score
86
Verified similar

Score blends exposure-level distance, factor-vector shape, market-beta closeness, and a small backtested relative-Sharpe term.

MVV

ProShares Ultra MidCap400
SMB RMW
Adj. R2
0.950
Rel. Sharpe
0.501
Mkt beta
2.01
AUM
US$146M
MER
1.01%
Valuation
74

QVMS

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF
SMB RMW
Adj. R2
0.985
Rel. Sharpe
1.005
Mkt beta
0.99
AUM
US$217M
MER
0.15%
Valuation
130

Factor Exposure Match

Blue bars compare raw factor beta magnitude. Green bars compare absolute t-stat strength. Dim bars indicate the t-stat is below 1.96.

SMB
MVV
+1.00
|t|
+14.4
QVMS
+0.97
|t|
+23.8
diff +0.03
HML
MVV
+0.24
|t|
+3.7
QVMS
+0.27
|t|
+6.6
diff -0.02
RMW
MVV
+0.34
|t|
+4.0
QVMS
+0.27
|t|
+6.6
diff +0.07
CMA
MVV
-0.03
|t|
-0.3
QVMS
-0.06
|t|
-1.2
diff +0.03
UMD
MVV
+0.02
|t|
+0.5
QVMS
+0.06
|t|
+2.1
diff -0.04

Why This Pair Matches

Exposure level
91
Exposure shape
100
Mkt beta diff
1.02
Rel. Sharpe diff
0.503

This comparison focuses on measured factor exposure, not a qualitative review of each fund's portfolio-construction process. Backtested relative Sharpe is included as a secondary signal, while we continue refining a comparison metric that separates factor payoff from alpha. See methodology.

MVV fund page QVMS fund page US ETF Leaders US Universe
Important context

VerifiedBeta publishes educational ETF research, not personalized investment advice, portfolio management, or security recommendations. Funds that screen well here can still be unsuitable for your objectives, taxes, liquidity needs, or constraints. Review fund documents, methodology assumptions, and your own circumstances before acting. See the full disclaimer.